SPECIALIZING IN THE CREATION OF I N T E R A C T I V E --------------------------------------- :-) GAMES AND SOUNDS FOR CHILDREN SPECIALIZING IN THE CREATION OF I N T E R A C T I V E --------------------------------------- :-) GAMES AND SOUNDS FOR CHILDREN
We provide all the electronics necessary to integrate a PLAYNOTE Interactive Sound System, Interactive Tap Switch panels, or a Pik Soundtower System into your play environment. They can be installed either interior or exterior, for many commercial play components, including: Helicopter, Slide, Submarine, NASA Space capsule, Racecars, Telephone, Fire truck and others
This might take a little time to download.
The Playnote Sound System utilizes the latest in MP3 technology.
The sound files are placed on a MULTIMEDIACARD, which have up to 120 minutes of audio space available, and can be divided into many different sounds that can be easily re-programmed.
The sound files can be produced for : Continuous, Random, or Sequential Play
Each time a child touches a Tap Switch, passes a sensor or steps on a Pik sensor, a New Sound will Play.
NOTE: A 20 Amp dedicated circuit with a isolated ground is required.
10/24/09 08:03
Just a little information below for those of you who feel you want to COPY sounds; please LISTEN, but these "sounds" are COPYRIGHTED
The Supreme Court recently has turned down an appeal from a Texas teenager who got in trouble for downloading "sounds" without paying. Whitney Harper acknowledged she used file-sharing networks to download and share three dozen songs. But she said the money she owes music companies should be reduced because as a 16-year-old she didn't know that what she did amounted to copyright infringement. The justices rejected Harper's appeal Monday over a dissent from Justice Samuel Alito. The issue in the case is whether people who illegally swap music online can try to show that they did so innocently. Harper wanted the money owed for each "sound" cut to $200 from $750. Sorry, no excuse, you shall be responsible for your actions. The case is Harper v. Maverick Recording Co., 10-94. /p>